Submissions
The Law Briefing Room welcomes submissions of Articles, Responses, and Explainers through our electronic submission system.
Length: Submissions should be in the range of 500-1500 words.
Title: Titles must not exceed 10 words.
Co-authorship: Allowed.
Originality Guidelines:
By submitting to The TLBR, the author declares that:
a) The work is entirely their own.
b) Any work of others, whether published or not, is properly identified and referenced.
c) The piece has not been and will not be published elsewhere.
Citations and Formatting:
a) All citations must be hyperlinked.
b) Submissions must be readable Microsoft Word documents (.docx) format.
Review Process:
Submissions are reviewed on a rolling basis.
Plagiarism Policy:
Submissions with plagiarism above 10% will not be considered
Specific Guidelines for Responses:
Engagement: Response pieces must engage with the subject matter and arguments presented in the original article. They should provide counterpoints, extensions, or supporting arguments.
Respectfulness: Responses should be respectful and refrain from personal attacks. Focus on critiquing the ideas and arguments, not the individual authors.
Constructive Criticism: Aim to contribute constructively to the discussion, providing thoughtful and reasoned feedback and should maintain a professional tone throughout your submission.
The Publication Process
When an article reaches us, it undergoes a rigorous yet supportive editorial process. Here’s a step-by-step breakdown of what happens:
Submission: Authors submit their manuscripts via electronic submission through the submissions page on our website. Each submission is acknowledged immediately through an automatic response, and authors are provided with a timeline for the review process post receiving the piece.
Initial Review: Our editorial team conducts an initial review to ensure the submission meets our basic criteria for quality, relevance, and strength of argument. This step is usually completed within three working days.
Peer Review: Suitable articles are then sent for peer review. We have a diverse panel of reviewers who provide constructive feedback, focusing on improving the article’s clarity, argumentation, and overall quality. The peer review process typically takes two weeks.
Revisions or Rejection: Based on the feedback, authors may be asked to make revisions. Our team works closely with authors to help them refine their articles, ensuring that the final product is both polished and impactful. In cases where an article does not meet our criteria, it may be rejected. However, since our aim is to promote diversity of opinion and transparency, we will provide detailed editorial reasoning for non-publishing decisions.
Final Approval: Once revisions are made, the article undergoes a final review by our senior editorial team. If approved, it is scheduled for publication.
Publication: The article is published on our platform, accompanied by a summary and key takeaways to help readers quickly grasp its essence. Authors are encouraged to engage with readers through comments and follow-up articles.
We recognize the frustrations associated with the traditional publication process. At TLBR, we strive to make publishing as smooth and enjoyable as possible. Our editorial team will promptly update authors on the status of their manuscripts every five days, eliminating the need for authors to chase updates and ensuring transparent communication.
In the end, TLBR aims to be more than just a publication platform; it is a community dedicated to fostering deep, meaningful legal discourse. By providing a space for diverse voices and ensuring a respectful environment, we aim to elevate the quality of legal discussions and contribute to a more informed and engaged public. Whether you are a student, an academic, a practitioner, or simply someone interested in the law, TLBR welcomes you to join the conversation and make your voice heard.